According to paragraph 2 of Article 206 of the CPC! the investigating judge VIDEO IN THE may issue a ruling obliging the CCC to deliver to the investigating judge a conscript who is forcibly detain and is in the CCC?
From the analysis of the above article! it can be conclud that exclusively within the framework of criminal proceedings! the investigating judge ensures compliance with the rights of a person who is detain by sales page: what can’t be missing to sell every day? a state authority or official! Depriv of liberty in the absence of a court decision that has entered into legal force! or not releas from custody after posting bail in accordance with the VIDEO IN THE procedure established by the Criminal Procedure Code.
According to Part 2 of Article 206 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
If an investigating judge receives information from any sources that creates a reasonable suspicion that a person deprived of liberty in the absence of a court decision that has entered into legal force! or not releas from custody after posting bail in accordance with the procedure establishe by this Code.
Is located within the territorial jurisdiction of the court! he is oblig to issue a ruling that shall oblige any state authority or official in whose custody. The person is being held to immediately deliver ite (technology and electronics) skills this person to the investigating judge to clarify the grounds for the deprivation of liberty.
Therefore! when applying to the court with a relevant application within the framework of the consider article! it is seen that the legal relationship arises from the norms of the CPC! while the application should include evidence that the conscript was illegally detain by employees of the CCC and the SP! and the circumstances that the latter is illegally detained at a certain address.
Otherwise the court will proce from the fact
The applicant’s claim of illegal detention will not correspond to reality! but is hindi directory clearly far-fetch and such that it prevents the implementation of the conscription of citizens for military service during mobilization! since the conscription of citizens for military service during mobilization is not a deprivation of a person’s right to freedom and personal integrity! guaranteed by the Constitution of Ukraine.
