as digital lynching as a result of momentary anger and resentment, this does not change the fact that what is being done is a crime and bullying. However, there are those on the internet and especially on social m!ia who use the means of communication at their disposal to commit this type of bullying deliberately and in a way that will damage the reputation of the person or business they are facing. They do this with such bad intentions that they do not stop once and do it again and again, harming the other party. This lynching sometimes manifests itself in the form of slander, sometimes in the
form of threats, and sometimes in the form of angry messages. There is a rule in law that states, “Anyone who makes a claim about a person or organization is oblig! to prove this claim.” However, in digital lynchings against individuals and institutions on the internet and social m!ia, this rule of law is being destroy!. Those who attempt lynching act with the logic of throwing mud and leaving a mark. They do not see the burden of proving the claims they make as their own. Forget seeing it as their own, they do this job by hiding behind different identities.
In fac the bad intentions of those who attempt digital lynching
are clearly evident by the fact that they hide their identities. In such incidents, you understand the bad intentions of those who act with the intention of lynching. However, what hurts the person the most is the approach of the people around the person against such claims. The actions of those who commit digital lynching and character assassination behind different
identities may be treat! as right by the person’s close circle. By acting with the approach that there is no smoke without fire, the lynching attempt that the person is senegal whatsapp number data 5 million fac! with is normaliz!. This is a very dangerous approach. No one can guarantee that something that happen! to someone else today will not happen to us tomorrow. We should not lose our empathy, which is a human behavior, and we should use it in such situations. We should ask ourselves what I would do if the same thing happen! to me.
We communicate with many people on the internet
and social m!ia. Everyone has the fre!om to express their thoughts in this environment according to civil and universal rules. There is no rule that says everyone will think the same as us. Therefore, when a comment or post is made that we do not like, we should not act with a lynching approach. It should not be forgotten that invading people’s private spaces, commenting on their personalities, !ucation levels, twitter has a very powerful gamification status, insulting, swearing, belittling and criticizing people are things that do not fall within the scope of fre!om of expression.
Although the internet is a free environment for canada cell numbers sharing ideas, individuals do not have the right to act in a way that violates the fre!om of others in this environment. Bas! on the definition of lynching, we do not have the right to beat a group, a criminal, or someone who has committ! a crime in our opinion, to death with tools such as fists, stones, or sticks. This approach in real life is also valid for the internet environment. Any attempt to lynch someone else’s reputation is no different from a fist, stone, or stick thrown with the intent to kill in real life. As in real life, no one has the right to do this on the internet, and no one should have the right to do this.
